Everhour adds time, rates, and estimate tracking to Basecamp to-dos so planned effort can be checked against logged work.
Try with my Basecamp
$10k of $15k
Hourly
0:00:00
Alejandro Luna0:00:00Kai Nani0:00:00Kai Nani0:00:00Click!
Dave Jung0:00:00Alejandro Luna0:00:00Dave JungThe calculator gives you the number — Everhour takes it from there.
One click and you're timing. Start a timer, add an entry, edit the details. This is exactly how it feels in Everhour.
Set a budget, assign rates, and get alerted before you're over.
Measurement
Track your budget through time or costs
Every report you need — configured your way, always up to date.
Tracked hours flow straight into a polished invoice — no copy-paste, no manual math.
Turn each Basecamp to-do into an effort estimate that the team can review after work is logged. The to-do title defines the work, the notes clarify scope, the assignee owns the execution, and the due date sets the calendar target. The duration estimate belongs in hours, because hours let you compare planned effort with time actually logged against that to-do.
A good estimate answers one practical question: how much focused work should this to-do take? A 2-hour estimate fits a contained task with known inputs. An 8-hour estimate signals a full working day for one person. A 20-hour estimate usually needs subtasks, staged review, or a broader budget check before work starts.
A due date and a duration estimate solve different planning problems. The due date says when the to-do should be complete. The duration estimate says how much work the assignee expects to spend before completion. A to-do due Friday can still be a 1-hour job, and a to-do due next month can still consume 30 hours.
This distinction prevents a common planning mistake: treating a long calendar window as a large effort estimate. A task assigned on Monday and due Friday does not automatically represent 40 hours of work. Use the to-do notes and subtasks to define scope, then attach the hour estimate to the actual labor expected from the person doing the work.
The useful review starts after work is logged against the same Basecamp to-do. Compare the estimate with actual tracked time and read the difference as a planning signal. A 6-hour estimate with 9 hours logged shows 3 hours over the plan. A 10-hour estimate with 4 hours logged can mean the scope was simpler than expected or the team missed time entries.
Variance needs context before it changes the next plan. Over-estimate hours point to under-scoped work, interruptions, rework, or review cycles that the original estimate ignored. Under-estimate hours can show reused work, unclear recording habits, or a task that carried too much buffer. The next estimate gets better when the reason is attached to the to-do, not just the number.
A one-off estimate works when you need a quick planning number for a single to-do. It is enough for a small Basecamp project, a short client request, or a task that does not affect budget, billing, or staffing. The estimate should still sit beside actual logged time so the team can see whether the plan held.
A managed workflow matters once the same estimate pattern repeats across projects. Everhour can compare tracked time against task estimates and show remaining or over-estimate hours in reports. Teams can also price Basecamp project work by hourly rate, fixed fee, or non-billable status, then use that record to inform future budgets instead of starting each estimate from memory.
This content is for general information only, may not be fully up to date, and is provided without any warranty or liability.
High Performer
G2
Summer 2026
Best Ease Of Use
Capterra
Summer 2026
Rated in the top time trackers across G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius — with consistent praise for ease of use, integrations, and support.
Start with the smallest complete work unit in the to-do. Use the title, notes, assignee, subtasks, and due date to define scope, then estimate the effort in hours. A vague task needs subtasks before a useful duration number. A clear task can carry one estimate that later gets compared with logged time.
Use work hours for duration when the goal is effort planning. Calendar dates belong in the schedule, while hours describe the labor required to finish the to-do. Mixing the two makes the plan look larger when a task spans several days but only requires a short working session.
Estimate to-dos that affect budget, billing, staffing, or deadlines. Small administrative items can stay unestimated if reviewing them adds no value. Client-facing work, multi-person tasks, repeatable delivery steps, and risky unknowns deserve estimates because the actual time creates a useful record for the next project.
Actual time over the estimate means the plan missed part of the work or the execution took longer than expected. The cause can be unclear scope, rework, waiting time, review cycles, or a missing subtask. Record the reason before changing future estimates, because the same variance can point to different fixes.
The fastest mistake is comparing an estimate to time logged somewhere else. The estimate belongs to one Basecamp to-do, and the actual hours need to land on that same to-do. Team-level totals or project-level totals can hide which task caused the variance.
Everhour separates internal cost rates from client-facing billable rates, with per-person defaults and per-project overrides. A Basecamp project can use project, member, or custom task rates, so logged time against to-dos can support cost, revenue, and profit review.
Everhour's Basecamp reports can include project, to-do, list, task ID, and task status fields. That structure keeps the estimate review tied to the Basecamp work item, so remaining time and over-estimate hours stay connected to the to-do that produced them.
Track Basecamp to-do estimates, actual hours, and rate-based results in Everhour, then use the record to plan future project budgets with better evidence.
14-day free trial · No credit card · Cancel anytime
