Everhour embeds tracking in Asana so task hours, summaries, budgets, and exports stay tied to project work.
Try with my AsanaThe calculator gives you the number — Everhour takes it from there.
One click and you're timing. Start a timer, add an entry, edit the details. This is exactly how it feels in Everhour.
Set a budget, assign rates, and get alerted before you're over.
Measurement
Track your budget through time or costs
Every report you need — configured your way, always up to date.
Tracked hours flow straight into a polished invoice — no copy-paste, no manual math.
An Asana task time summary is for turning task-level work into a reviewable record. You need the task name, project, assignee, date, time spent, description, billable status, and approval status in one place. The goal is practical: see which tasks consumed the week, which entries need correction, and which hours belong in billing, budgeting, or payroll review.
The summary should follow the structure your team already uses in Asana. Project names, task titles, custom fields, and tags give the hours context, so the report reads like work history instead of a detached timesheet. A useful summary answers three questions fast: who worked, on what task, and whether the time is ready for the next workflow.
Task time can be summarized by person, task, project, date, billable status, or approval status. A manager reviewing delivery usually starts with project and task. A finance reviewer often needs billable versus non-billable hours, rates, and budget impact. A team lead checking workload needs member totals and entries that look incomplete, late, or inconsistent.
Avoid grouping everything into one weekly total. A total of 42 hours says little without task context. A better summary shows 6 hours on discovery, 12 hours on implementation, 3 hours on revisions, and 2 non-billable hours on internal coordination. That level of detail protects the client record and gives the team a useful project history.
A task time summary becomes unreliable when entries lack descriptions, use the wrong project, or mix billable and non-billable work under one vague line. Each entry should identify the task, the date worked, the duration, and the reason the work belongs there. Approval status matters because unreviewed time should not flow into billing or payroll without a manager check.
Billable status needs the same discipline. Client-facing work and internal coordination can sit inside the same Asana project, but the summary should separate them before anyone exports the data. Rates, budgets, and time-cost reporting only stay useful when the source entries are specific enough to explain the work after the week closes.
A one-off summary is enough when you need to review one project, one week, or one client question. It works for a quick check before a meeting or a small export for a stakeholder. The limit appears when the same summary has to support recurring approvals, budget review, invoicing, and finance handoff every week.
Everhour turns that repeated work into a managed Asana workflow. Tracking controls sit inside Asana tasks, project and task data sync into Everhour, and reports can show time, budgets, billable status, and project summaries with exportable columns. That gives teams a durable record instead of rebuilding the same task summary from scratch.
This content is for general information only, may not be fully up to date, and is provided without any warranty or liability.
High Performer
G2
Summer 2026
Best Ease Of Use
Capterra
Summer 2026
Rated in the top time trackers across G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius — with consistent praise for ease of use, integrations, and support.
A complete summary includes task name, project, assignee, logged date, duration, work description, billable status, approval status, and any project or tag context needed for review. Finance teams also need rates or budget fields when the summary supports cost, billing, or profitability work.
Use task grouping when the main question is where project time went. Use person grouping when the main question is who worked and whether their entries are complete. For client review, task grouping with member detail usually gives the clearest record without hiding accountability.
Fix entries with missing descriptions, wrong projects, unclear task names, duplicate time, incorrect billable status, or unapproved time that should not move forward. Late manual entries also deserve review because they often contain less context than timer-based entries recorded while the work happened.
Each description should name the work completed in plain language, not just the activity type. "Updated onboarding email error state" is more useful than "development." The description should be short enough for a report and specific enough for a manager or client to understand the time later.
Yes, when time entries connect to rates, billable status, and project budget targets. A useful budget summary shows total time, remaining budget, billable versus non-billable hours, and the tasks driving the spend. Alert thresholds also help managers review work before a project reaches its limit.
Everhour adds tracking controls inside Asana tasks and projects, then syncs project names, task titles, custom fields, and tags into reports. Teams can track time where the work lives and review task-level summaries without separating hours from Asana project context.
Everhour reports can include task, project, member, budget, and billable fields, with more than 30 columns available for Asana-based reporting. Teams can export summaries to Excel when they need spreadsheet review, client backup, or finance handoff.
Track approved hours inside Asana tasks, then let Everhour sync project context into reports, budget views, and exports for cleaner weekly review.
14-day free trial · No credit card · Cancel anytime