Everhour adds task-level tracking and cost records inside Asana, giving content teams cleaner timesheets for review and billing.
Try with my AsanaThe calculator gives you the number — Everhour takes it from there.
One click and you're timing. Start a timer, add an entry, edit the details. This is exactly how it feels in Everhour.
Set a budget, assign rates, and get alerted before you're over.
Measurement
Track your budget through time or costs
Every report you need — configured your way, always up to date.
Tracked hours flow straight into a polished invoice — no copy-paste, no manual math.
A content team timesheet should show the work behind briefs, drafts, edits, reviews, publishing, and production support. The Asana task gives each entry its work context: project, task title, assignee, status, tags, and custom fields. Everhour adds the time layer, so writers, editors, designers, and managers can track hours against the same task records the team already uses.
The useful outcome is a week of entries that a manager can review without guessing. Each entry needs the person, task, date, duration, and a short description when the task title alone does not explain the work. Billable status also matters when client work, internal operations, and non-billable revisions share the same content calendar.
Content teams lose timesheet accuracy when every entry lands under one broad bucket such as writing or marketing. Separate the workflow into categories that match how the team reviews work: strategy, outline, draft, edit, design, stakeholder review, publishing, and reporting. Those categories help managers compare planned work with actual effort without reading every comment line.
The most common mistake is mixing rework, meetings, and client-facing production in the same line. A 3-hour draft and a 1-hour client revision tell a different story from a single 4-hour writing entry. Use separate entries when the work affects billing, staffing, margin, or future estimates.
A clean weekly timesheet starts with daily entries and ends with manager approval. Team members track time on the task they worked on, add notes for unclear work, and submit the week once entries are complete. Managers review totals by person, project, task, and billable status before hours feed billing, budget review, or payroll preparation.
Approved time needs protection. After a manager accepts the week, late edits should follow a correction path instead of quietly changing reports. That control matters for content retainers, campaign budgets, and reimbursement records because one backdated change can alter invoice totals, profitability reports, and staffing decisions for future editorial work.
A one-off timesheet works for a small content sprint, a freelance week, or a quick reconciliation after a deadline. It is enough when you only need to confirm who worked on which Asana tasks and whether the totals look reasonable. It stops being enough when the same data must support billing, approvals, cost review, and reimbursement.
A managed workflow keeps the Asana task as the work record while Everhour carries time, budgets, expenses, and reporting. Teams can use approvals, locked periods, billable and non-billable reporting, budget alerts, and expense records with receipts, then export reports when finance needs a clean handoff.
This content is for general information only, may not be fully up to date, and is provided without any warranty or liability.
High Performer
G2
Summer 2026
Best Ease Of Use
Capterra
Summer 2026
Rated in the top time trackers across G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius — with consistent praise for ease of use, integrations, and support.
Use Asana tasks for assignment context and track time against the specific brief, draft, edit, design, or publishing task. Keep entries dated, tied to one person, and labeled by billable status when client work is involved. Add a short description when the task title does not explain the work performed.
Separate entries when the work changes the decision a manager needs to make. Drafting, editing, client revisions, internal meetings, publishing, and reporting should not be combined when they affect billing, workload planning, or budget review. One broad entry hides the cause of overruns and makes future estimates weaker.
Weekly approval gives managers a practical review cadence before details fade. Daily review creates unnecessary admin work for most content teams, while monthly review leaves too much room for missing tasks, vague comments, and late corrections. A weekly cutoff also supports cleaner billing and payroll preparation.
Mixed categories, missing task links, late manual entries, and unclear billable status make reconciliation slow. A manager should be able to trace each entry to a person, task, date, and work type. Entries that combine unrelated work force the reviewer to ask follow-up questions before approving the week.
Review expenses alongside timesheets when content work includes stock assets, contractor charges, travel, printing, or reimbursable production costs. Time explains labor effort, while expense records explain non-labor project cost. Keeping both in the same review cycle gives finance a clearer view of true campaign cost.
Everhour Expenses lets teams record project costs with receipt images or PDFs, unit-based categories, budget inclusion controls, invoice integration, and expense reports. That gives content managers a cleaner reimbursement and profitability workflow when expenses belong beside tracked Asana task time.
Everhour embeds tracking controls inside Asana tasks and syncs project and task details into reports. Managers can review weekly project hours and working hours, approve or reject submitted time, and use locked periods to protect approved records before billing or payroll review.
Track approved hours and project expenses from Asana tasks in Everhour, then use receipts, budget controls, invoice-ready data, and exportable reports to support billing and profitability review.
14-day free trial · No credit card · Cancel anytime