Asana keeps work organized by task and status. Everhour adds attendance reporting that turns tracked hours into review-ready records.
Try with my AsanaThe calculator gives you the number — Everhour takes it from there.
One click and you're timing. Start a timer, add an entry, edit the details. This is exactly how it feels in Everhour.
Set a budget, assign rates, and get alerted before you're over.
Measurement
Track your budget through time or costs
Every report you need — configured your way, always up to date.
Tracked hours flow straight into a polished invoice — no copy-paste, no manual math.
Asana attendance tracking is for teams that need a dependable record of who worked, when they worked, and which Asana tasks or projects those hours supported. The practical outcome is a weekly attendance record that managers can review without chasing separate notes, chat messages, or end-of-week memory.
A useful attendance record connects each person, date, project, task, and time entry description. The record should also separate ordinary project time from exceptions such as missing entries, unusually long days, or time logged after the work happened. That structure gives payroll, billing, and project leads one shared view of attendance instead of several partial versions.
Attendance tracking does not require every small work movement to become a separate entry. A good setup captures enough detail to explain the day without turning timekeeping into a second job. For project work, task-level entries work well when the task explains the work performed. For general internal work, a clear project or admin category can be enough.
The main decision is consistency. If one person logs 8 hours to a single weekly task while another logs 20 short entries per day, managers cannot compare attendance patterns cleanly. Set a rule for daily logging, require a short description when the task name is vague, and review exceptions before the period closes.
A weekly attendance review should catch missing days, duplicate entries, unusually high totals, and time assigned to the wrong project. Managers should also check entries that affect billing or payroll before those records move downstream. Corrections are cheaper before an invoice, payroll run, or client report uses the hours.
A simple review flow starts with daily completeness, then moves to project assignment, billable status, and approval. For example, a manager can check whether Monday through Friday each contain working time, whether the hours sit on the right Asana project, and whether any entry needs a clearer description before approval.
A one-off attendance check works for a small team, a short project, or a quick reconciliation after a busy week. It answers a narrow question: who logged time, on which days, and against which Asana work. That is enough when the record will not feed billing, payroll review, capacity planning, or recurring client reporting.
A managed workflow becomes necessary when attendance records need approvals, locked periods, repeatable reports, or a clean handoff to finance. Everhour connects Asana task context with reporting, timesheet approval, and exportable records, so reviewed attendance can become a durable source for billing, payroll review, and project analysis.
This content is for general information only, may not be fully up to date, and is provided without any warranty or liability.
High Performer
G2
Summer 2026
Best Ease Of Use
Capterra
Summer 2026
Rated in the top time trackers across G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius — with consistent praise for ease of use, integrations, and support.
An attendance record should include the person, date, total working time, Asana project or task, entry description, and review status. Teams that bill clients should also keep billable and non-billable time separate. The record becomes stronger when it shows corrections, late entries, and manager approval before payroll or billing review.
Daily tracking confirms whether the person worked that day, while task tracking explains where the time went. Use both when project accountability matters. A daily total without task context is weak for client work, and task entries without a daily review can hide missing days or uneven attendance patterns.
Managers should review missing workdays, duplicate entries, unusually long totals, entries on the wrong project, and vague descriptions. The riskiest mistake is approving a period before checking billable status and project assignment. Once the hours feed an invoice or payroll review, corrections take longer and create avoidable backtracking.
Weekly approval works for most project teams because it gives employees time to complete entries and gives managers a predictable review point. Daily review is useful for hourly, client-billed, or shift-like work. Monthly approval creates a memory problem because missing or incorrect entries are harder to explain weeks later.
Billable and non-billable categories matter when attendance records support invoicing, project profitability, or client reporting. Internal meetings, admin work, and training can belong in attendance totals without becoming billable time. Separating those categories keeps the attendance record complete while preventing non-billable work from inflating client charges.
Everhour Reporting turns Asana-linked time into customizable reports with columns, grouping, filters, date ranges, and exports. Managers can review attendance by person, project, task, and other synced work details, then download reports in CSV, Excel/XLSX, or PDF for payroll review, billing checks, or archive needs.
Everhour Timesheets let team members submit weekly project hours or working hours for manager review. Managers can approve, reject, or partially approve submitted time, and approved time stays locked for regular members so reviewed attendance does not change after the period closes.
Track attendance where Asana work happens, then use Everhour Reporting to group, filter, export, and review approved hours for payroll, billing, and project visibility.
14-day free trial · No credit card · Cancel anytime