Everhour tracks planned effort and logged hours on Basecamp to-dos, so teams can read estimate variance cleanly.
Try with my Basecamp
$10k of $15k
Hourly
0:00:00
Alejandro Luna0:00:00Kai Nani0:00:00Kai Nani0:00:00Click!
Dave Jung0:00:00Alejandro Luna0:00:00Dave JungThe calculator gives you the number — Everhour takes it from there.
One click and you're timing. Start a timer, add an entry, edit the details. This is exactly how it feels in Everhour.
Set a budget, assign rates, and get alerted before you're over.
Measurement
Track your budget through time or costs
Every report you need — configured your way, always up to date.
Tracked hours flow straight into a polished invoice — no copy-paste, no manual math.
Turn a Basecamp to-do into a trackable work item by giving it a clear time expectation before work starts. The to-do stays attached to its Basecamp project, list, title, notes, assignee, subtasks, due date, and completion status. The estimate adds the effort target, so the team can later compare the plan against time logged on that same to-do.
A useful estimate is specific enough to guide planning and loose enough to survive normal execution. A design review to-do can carry a 3-hour estimate; a research to-do with unresolved scope needs notes that explain the assumption. Dates and effort serve different jobs: Basecamp due dates show timing, while estimated hours show expected labor.
A per-to-do comparison needs three pieces: the original estimate, the logged hours, and the Basecamp context that explains the work. Everhour report fields for Basecamp include project, to-do, list, task ID, and task status, so the review can stay tied to the same structure the team used while doing the work.
Read the variance before changing the estimate process. Logged time above the estimate often means the to-do was under-scoped, split too broadly, or changed during execution. Logged time below the estimate can mean the work was simpler than expected, the estimate included contingency, or time was not recorded against the correct to-do.
Per-to-do time becomes useful when each to-do describes one reviewable piece of work. A to-do named "Landing page QA" gives a clearer estimate than "Website tasks" because the assignee, notes, subtasks, and due date all point to a single outcome. Broad to-dos hide the reason actual time moved away from the plan.
The common mistake is mixing effort, deadline, and progress into one number. Hill Charts show To-do List progress status by human-positioned dots, not calculated time or cost totals. Schedules show dates. Estimated hours show effort. Keep those signals separate, then review them together when a project manager needs the full picture.
A free one-off workflow is enough when you need a quick read on one Basecamp project, one to-do list, or a small set of completed tasks. Record the estimate before work starts, keep logged time tied to the to-do, then review the difference after completion. That gives you a practical answer without building a management process around it.
A managed workflow matters when estimate accuracy needs to improve across projects. Everhour Resource Planning adds visual timelines, member and project views, weekly capacity, availability gaps, scheduled time off, and planned-vs-actual comparisons. For Basecamp work, that turns isolated guesses into a track record that informs future budgets and staffing decisions.
This content is for general information only, may not be fully up to date, and is provided without any warranty or liability.
High Performer
G2
Summer 2026
Best Ease Of Use
Capterra
Summer 2026
Rated in the top time trackers across G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius — with consistent praise for ease of use, integrations, and support.
Set the estimate from the effort required to finish the to-do, not from the calendar time until its due date. Use the title, notes, assignee, subtasks, and due date to define scope first. Then enter an hours estimate that reflects the expected work for that specific to-do.
Estimate the to-dos that affect schedule, staffing, budget, or client expectations. Small administrative items do not need the same treatment unless they repeat often or create measurable project cost. A team gets better comparison data when estimates cover meaningful work units instead of every minor checklist item.
To-do hours measure effort. A due date or date range shows timing. A 4-hour to-do can be due tomorrow or next month, and those dates do not change the estimated labor. Keep the due date in Basecamp and the effort estimate in the time workflow so variance stays readable.
Actual time exceeds the estimate when the to-do was too broad, the scope changed, the work required rework, or the team missed part of the work during planning. It can also happen when time from related work is logged to the wrong to-do. Review the Basecamp notes and subtasks before judging the estimate.
Keep the project, to-do name, list, task ID, and task status attached to the time record. Those fields let a reviewer separate finished work from open work and compare similar to-dos across lists or projects. Without that context, a variance number loses the reason behind it.
Everhour Resource Planning compares planned capacity with actual tracked time, using visual timelines plus member and project views. For Basecamp projects, that gives managers a way to review whether estimated effort matched recorded work and whether future assignments fit weekly capacity.
Everhour embeds time tracking controls into Basecamp through its browser extension and syncs Basecamp project, to-do, list, task ID, and task status fields into reports. That keeps logged hours tied to the work structure people already use inside Basecamp.
Track planned and actual time on Basecamp to-dos, review variance by project, and use Everhour Resource Planning to make the next budget more accurate.
14-day free trial · No credit card · Cancel anytime
