Everhour adds embedded time and cost tracking to Linear issues so engineering spend is visible by project and issue.
Try with my Linear
$10k of $15k
Hourly
0:00:00
Alejandro Luna0:00:00Kai Nani0:00:00Kai Nani0:00:00Click!
Dave Jung0:00:00Alejandro Luna0:00:00Dave JungThe calculator gives you the number — Everhour takes it from there.
One click and you're timing. Start a timer, add an entry, edit the details. This is exactly how it feels in Everhour.
Set a budget, assign rates, and get alerted before you're over.
Measurement
Track your budget through time or costs
Every report you need — configured your way, always up to date.
Tracked hours flow straight into a polished invoice — no copy-paste, no manual math.
Teams managing engineering work in Linear need cost visibility for the same work they already organize by issue, project, cycle, assignee, priority, label, and status. The practical outcome is a cost view that shows where engineering time went, which work type consumed it, and which project or cycle review should absorb the spend.
The core workflow starts with Linear for issue structure and Everhour for the time and money layer. Everhour adds issue timers, manual logging, reported time, project total hours, synced Linear workspace data, and reports that can group cost by project, issue, status, tag, member, or date range.
A cost report needs three inputs: the Linear issue or project context, the tracked time entry, and the person's cost rate. Cost rates represent internal employee or contractor expense, separate from billable rates. That distinction matters for engineering finance because a non-client feature build still carries labor cost even when no invoice follows it.
A typical review line can read: API retry issue, backend project, cycle 42, Maya Chen, 6.5 hours, $95 cost rate, internal product work. The label or project shows the work category, the time entry shows actual effort, and the rate turns that effort into cost for project review.
Linear estimate values measure effort or size, using scales such as Exponential, Fibonacci, Linear, or T-Shirt. Treat those values as planning signals, not clock time. Linear estimate values support completion and effort statistics, while cost tracking needs hours actually logged and a cost rate attached to the person doing the work.
The useful feedback loop compares Linear estimate points, tracked hours, and cost after the work closes. A high-point issue with low logged time can confirm an efficient delivery path. A low-point issue with high labor cost exposes hidden complexity, interruptions, or review work that the original estimate did not capture.
A free one-off cost check works when you need a quick read on a single issue, project, or recent cycle. It is enough for a founder, engineering manager, or finance partner who wants to inspect a small slice of work and discuss whether the cost matches the result.
A managed workflow is better once cost needs to survive weekly review. Everhour connects Linear issue time to rates, budgets, reports, and embedded controls, so project owners can review per-project cost each cycle instead of reconstructing engineering spend from status updates and spreadsheets.
This content is for general information only, may not be fully up to date, and is provided without any warranty or liability.
High Performer
G2
Summer 2026
Best Ease Of Use
Capterra
Summer 2026
Rated in the top time trackers across G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius — with consistent praise for ease of use, integrations, and support.
Include issues that consume engineering time and belong to the cost question being reviewed. A project cost review should include project issues across the selected date range. A cycle cost review should include issue time recorded for the selected cycle work. Exclude unrelated support, meetings, or overhead only when the team classifies those categories separately and applies that rule consistently.
Billable and non-billable classification should explain the type of work, not erase internal labor cost. A customer implementation issue, internal platform task, bug fix, and research spike can all carry cost, even when only some of them become client-facing billable work.
Cost rates turn tracked hours into spend by person, project, and cycle review period. A cycle with 120 hours from a mixed team does not have one true cost until each person's rate is applied. Contractor rates, seniority differences, and project-specific overrides can change the cost of two cycles with the same total hours.
The common mistake is counting completed issues without connecting them to hours actually logged. Issue count, status movement, and estimate values show flow and scope. Cost review needs the actual time spent on those issues and the internal rate for each person who did the work.
Use both, but keep the question clear. Points help the team evaluate sizing accuracy. Dollars help the business understand labor spend. A useful review shows the estimate value, tracked hours, cost rate, and actual cost so planning quality and financial impact stay visible together.
Everhour embeds tracking controls in Linear through its browser extension and syncs Linear workspace, project, issue, status, and tag data into reports. Engineers can track time from Linear issues, while managers review hours and cost using the same project and issue context.
Everhour Reporting can group tracked time, labor cost, billable time, non-billable time, project data, members, and dates into configurable reports. A manager can build a project cost report, export it as CSV, Excel/XLSX, or PDF, and review spend with finance or leadership.
Everhour connects Linear issue time with rates, budgets, and reporting, giving teams a durable way to review engineering cost as part of each project cycle.
14-day free trial · No credit card · Cancel anytime
