Everhour connects tracked Linear issue time to cost reports for project, cycle, and rate-based engineering review.
Try with my Linear
$10k of $15k
Hourly
0:00:00
Alejandro Luna0:00:00Kai Nani0:00:00Kai Nani0:00:00Click!
Dave Jung0:00:00Alejandro Luna0:00:00Dave JungThe calculator gives you the number — Everhour takes it from there.
One click and you're timing. Start a timer, add an entry, edit the details. This is exactly how it feels in Everhour.
Set a budget, assign rates, and get alerted before you're over.
Measurement
Track your budget through time or costs
Every report you need — configured your way, always up to date.
Tracked hours flow straight into a polished invoice — no copy-paste, no manual math.
Use this page to turn Linear issue work into engineering hours that a lead, finance partner, or founder can review by project, cycle, person, and work type. Linear remains the place where issues, assignees, projects, cycles, labels, priority, and status organize the work. The hours layer needs to follow that same structure so cost reports line up with the way the engineering team already ships work.
A useful engineering hours tracker answers a direct question: which work consumed the team's paid time? The answer comes from time entries tied to issues, then grouped by project or cycle review period. Cost visibility starts when each person's tracked hours use the right internal cost rate, with billable versus non-billable treated as a work classification for reporting, not as a client invoice step.
Engineering cost tracking depends on person-level rates because two engineers can spend the same 6 hours on different cost bases. A contractor, senior engineer, and part-time specialist should not collapse into one average unless the review intentionally uses a blended rate. Everhour separates internal cost rates from billable rates, so labor cost reporting can stay distinct from revenue or client-facing pricing.
Rate timing matters during raises, contract changes, and team transfers. A dated rate change keeps older periods calculated under the rate that applied when the work happened. For Linear issue work, that lets a cycle review compare actual cost against the team's plan without rewriting last month's project report after a compensation or contractor-rate update.
The workflow starts with tracked time on Linear issues, then rolls that time into the project, member, task, and review-period views used by the team. A project cost report should include issue context, person, tracked hours, cost rate, labor cost, billable or non-billable classification, and the date range. That structure lets you separate delivery work from research, maintenance, support, planning, or internal overhead.
Estimates on Linear issues should stay separate from clock time. Linear estimate values express effort or size using team-level scales such as Exponential, Fibonacci, Linear, or T-Shirt. Cost review needs actual tracked hours multiplied by the relevant cost rate. The useful feedback loop compares estimated effort with actual hours and actual cost, then uses the variance to improve the next planning cycle.
A one-off tracker is enough when you need a snapshot, such as this week's hours on a small set of Linear issues or a quick project cost review after a cycle closes. The result should show which issues used time, which people contributed, and which cost rates apply. That is enough for a narrow review when the team does not need approvals, alerts, or recurring reporting.
A managed workflow becomes necessary when engineering spend needs a system of record. Everhour Resource Planning shows visual timelines, member and project views, weekly capacity, availability gaps, scheduled time off, and planned-versus-actual time comparisons. That gives cost reviews the workload context needed to explain whether spend came from planned delivery, overload, absences, or shifting priorities.
This content is for general information only, may not be fully up to date, and is provided without any warranty or liability.
High Performer
G2
Summer 2026
Best Ease Of Use
Capterra
Summer 2026
Rated in the top time trackers across G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius — with consistent praise for ease of use, integrations, and support.
Group hours by the same units used to manage the work: issue, project, cycle review period, person, and date range. Add cost rate and work classification so the report separates labor cost from raw time. A project total alone hides the review details that explain why cost changed.
Billable versus non-billable should classify the work, not remove it from engineering cost. Internal research, maintenance, support, and planning still consume paid engineering time. Excluding non-billable work from cost reports understates total spend and makes capacity planning look cleaner than the actual workload.
A contractor should use the internal cost rate that reflects the amount the company pays for that person's work during the reporting period. If the contractor's rate changes, the report should preserve the old rate for older time and apply the new rate from the effective date.
Estimate points describe effort or size, while tracked hours record time actually spent. Treating points as hours creates false cost totals because Linear estimate scales such as Fibonacci or T-Shirt do not define a native conversion to payroll time or labor cost. Cost reporting should use tracked hours and cost rates.
The most common mistake is reviewing only completed issues. A cycle can include started work, carryover, planning, support, and partial progress that consumed time before completion. A reliable review includes all tracked issue time in the cycle date range, then separates completed delivery from work still in progress.
Everhour Resource Planning shows workload on visual timelines with member and project views, weekly capacity, availability gaps, and scheduled time off. Teams can compare planned capacity with actual tracked time so project cost reviews reflect the capacity available during the work period.
Everhour reporting can group tracked Linear time by project, task, member, date range, and cost-related columns. Admins can build reports that show labor cost beside billable and non-billable time, then export the results for finance or leadership review.
Use Everhour Resource Planning to compare planned capacity with actual tracked time, so every engineering cost review has workload context behind the numbers.
14-day free trial · No credit card · Cancel anytime
