Engineering overtime needs reviewed weekly records across issues. Everhour adds approval-ready timesheets to Linear work.
Try with my LinearThe calculator gives you the number — Everhour takes it from there.
One click and you're timing. Start a timer, add an entry, edit the details. This is exactly how it feels in Everhour.
Set a budget, assign rates, and get alerted before you're over.
Measurement
Track your budget through time or costs
Every report you need — configured your way, always up to date.
Tracked hours flow straight into a polished invoice — no copy-paste, no manual math.
You need a week-by-week view of engineering time tied to the issues people worked on, the project context, and the person who logged the hours. Linear remains the place where issues, projects, assignees, status, labels, and cycles organize the work. Everhour adds the time layer, so hours attach to that Linear work instead of living in a separate spreadsheet.
A useful overtime record shows daily working hours, project hours, issue-level entries, comments where needed, and the submission status for the week. The manager reviews totals before the period becomes a payroll or cost-reporting source. Approved time then becomes the operating record for that week, rather than a loose collection of personal notes and late updates.
Hour estimates and issue scope do not replace tracked time. Engineering teams use estimates to plan work, size issues, and forecast delivery, while overtime review needs hours actually worked by person and date. Treat estimates as planning context only. The timesheet should show the time entry, the Linear issue, the day, and the person responsible for that entry.
A common mistake is accepting a full week because the issue work looks complete. Completion status does not prove the amount of time worked. Review the weekly grid for missing days, unusually high daily totals, work logged to the wrong issue, and entries added after the person already submitted the week. Those checks protect payroll review and project cost reporting from avoidable cleanup.
A practical engineering overtime workflow has a weekly close. Contributors log time from timers or manual entries, submit the week, and wait for manager review. The reviewer approves clean time, rejects incorrect entries, or partially approves a week when only some entries need correction. Submitted time should not stay open to casual edits while payroll or cost reports are being prepared.
Locked periods matter because late edits change totals after managers have already made decisions. Regular members should not change approved time without a withdrawal, rejection, or admin correction path. Admin corrections still need a visible trail, including the affected person, date, issue, and reason for the change. That trail is what makes the record usable beyond a status meeting.
A one-off timesheet works when you need to collect a small set of hours for a single week and confirm obvious overtime entries. It is enough for a short internal review, a one-time contractor check, or a lightweight reconciliation where the manager controls every entry and no downstream handoff depends on repeated accuracy.
A managed workflow is the better fit once engineering hours feed payroll review, cost reporting, billing, or recurring budget checks. Everhour Timesheets collect weekly project hours and working hours, support submit, approve, reject, and partial approval flows, and keep approved time locked for regular members. That turns Linear issue work into a reviewed record with corrections, exports, and manager accountability.
This content is for general information only, may not be fully up to date, and is provided without any warranty or liability.
High Performer
G2
Summer 2026
Best Ease Of Use
Capterra
Summer 2026
Rated in the top time trackers across G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius — with consistent praise for ease of use, integrations, and support.
Track overtime from hours actually worked, not issue status or estimate values. Each entry should connect the person, date, Linear issue, project, and time amount. Managers then review weekly totals, daily patterns, and late changes before approving the period for payroll or cost reporting.
The core fields are person, date, Linear issue, project, working hours, project hours, entry source, comments, and approval status. Comments matter when an entry is unusually long, added after the fact, or tied to urgent work that needs payroll or cost context later.
No. Hour estimates are planning inputs, while overtime review needs recorded hours actually worked. Use estimates to compare expected effort against logged time, then rely on the submitted timesheet for the payroll or cost record.
Review daily totals, missing workdays, entries placed on the wrong issue, manual entries added late, and weeks submitted with unexplained spikes. Reject or partially approve the week when corrections are needed, then approve only the entries that match the work record.
Approved time should stay locked for regular members. Admins can correct time when payroll or reporting records need cleanup, but the correction should preserve the person, date, issue, changed amount, and reason so the final record remains defensible.
Everhour Timesheets collect weekly project hours and working hours by person, then let managers approve, reject, partially approve, and lock submitted time. For Linear work, that gives engineering managers a reviewed weekly record before payroll, billing, or reporting uses the hours.
Everhour Reporting turns approved time into configurable reports with columns, filters, date ranges, and exports in CSV, Excel/XLSX, or PDF. Managers can review hours by member, project, client, task, and overtime fields when overtime tracking is enabled.
Use Everhour Timesheets to submit, review, approve, and lock Linear project hours before payroll or cost reports use them, creating a cleaner handoff from engineering work to approved records.
14-day free trial · No credit card · Cancel anytime