Cycle plans need issue estimates and real logged hours; Everhour keeps the comparison tied to Linear work.
Try with my Linear
$10k of $15k
Hourly
0:00:00
Alejandro Luna0:00:00Kai Nani0:00:00Kai Nani0:00:00Click!
Dave Jung0:00:00Alejandro Luna0:00:00Dave JungThe calculator gives you the number — Everhour takes it from there.
One click and you're timing. Start a timer, add an entry, edit the details. This is exactly how it feels in Everhour.
Set a budget, assign rates, and get alerted before you're over.
Measurement
Track your budget through time or costs
Every report you need — configured your way, always up to date.
Tracked hours flow straight into a polished invoice — no copy-paste, no manual math.
Use this page to plan a Linear cycle around issue-level effort and actual logged time. The practical job is to see whether the selected work fits the team's available capacity, then review the result after the cycle closes. Each issue needs enough context to support that review: title, status, assignee, priority, estimate, cycle, label, and project when those fields apply.
Treat the cycle as a time-boxed planning window, not a substitute for time records. Estimate values on Linear issues describe expected effort or size. Logged hours show time actually spent. The useful comparison comes from keeping both numbers connected to the same issue, so the team can read the gap without guessing which work consumed the time.
Start with a clear estimate on each issue selected for the cycle. Linear supports estimate scales such as Exponential, Fibonacci, Linear, and T-Shirt, so the team should agree on what the chosen scale means before planning. Points and shirt sizes are planning units; hours are measured work time. Do not treat one point as a fixed number of hours unless the team has explicitly adopted that internal convention.
After work starts, track hours against the issue instead of recording time only at the project level. A finished issue with a low estimate and high logged time signals under-scoped work, a blocker, or hidden review effort. A finished issue with high estimate and low logged time signals overestimation, reuse of existing work, or missing time entries. The variance only becomes useful when the underlying entries are complete.
The biggest mistake is mixing three different meanings of time: the cycle date range, the issue effort estimate, and hours actually worked. A two-week cycle tells you the calendar window. An estimate value tells you planned effort. Logged time tells you labor spent. Keep those separate in review notes, because a deadline problem and an effort-estimation problem call for different fixes.
Another common error is judging estimate accuracy from completed issues only. Carried-over issues still used team capacity during the cycle, even when their final status sits outside the date range. Review started work, completed work, and the hours logged during the cycle window. That keeps the planning conversation focused on capacity consumed, not only on the work that crossed the finish line.
A one-off planning check is enough when a small team wants a quick cycle sanity review: issue list, estimate values, tracked hours, and a short note on variance. That gives you a usable snapshot for the next planning meeting, especially when the same team owns the next cycle and the work type stays similar.
A managed workflow becomes necessary when estimates affect budgets, staffing, or client commitments. Everhour Resource Planning uses visual timelines, member and project views, weekly capacity, availability gaps, scheduled time off, and planned-vs-actual time comparisons. That turns a single cycle review into a track record of estimate accuracy that can inform future capacity plans and project budgets.
This content is for general information only, may not be fully up to date, and is provided without any warranty or liability.
High Performer
G2
Summer 2026
Best Ease Of Use
Capterra
Summer 2026
Rated in the top time trackers across G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius — with consistent praise for ease of use, integrations, and support.
Issue estimates should describe expected effort or size before the cycle starts. Use them to compare planned scope against team capacity, then compare them with logged hours after work is done. Keep points, shirt sizes, and clock hours separate unless the team has a documented internal conversion rule.
Review both, but answer different questions with each view. Issue-level review shows which work was under-scoped or overestimated. Person-level review shows whether the cycle plan overloaded someone or left capacity unused. A useful cycle retrospective connects both views without treating one as a replacement for the other.
A large gap means the team needs to inspect the issue history, comments, blockers, and time entries. Higher actual time can point to under-scoped work or extra review. Lower actual time can point to overestimation or missing entries. The variance is a prompt for review, not a final diagnosis.
Points are planning values for expected effort or size. Logged hours are time actually spent on work. Linear issue estimate scales can use values such as Fibonacci, Linear, Exponential, or T-Shirt sizing. Hours belong in the time record, because they support capacity review, billing, cost analysis, and future planning.
The worst forecast comes from carrying estimates forward while ignoring actual logged hours. The next plan then repeats old assumptions instead of using evidence from completed and carried-over work. A cycle review should record planned effort, actual time, and the reason for major variance before the next set of issues is selected.
Everhour Resource Planning compares planned capacity with actual tracked time on visual timelines, with member and project views for workload review. Managers can account for weekly capacity, availability gaps, and scheduled time off before using the cycle's actual hours to adjust the next plan.
Everhour embeds time controls in Linear through its browser extension and syncs Linear workspace, project, issue, status, and tag data into reports. Team members can use timers or manual entries on issues, so reported time stays tied to the work item being reviewed.
Use Everhour Resource Planning to compare planned capacity with actual tracked time across Linear work, so future cycle plans start from recorded effort, availability, and capacity.
14-day free trial · No credit card · Cancel anytime
