Everhour adds hour tracking, approvals, and budget context to Linear issues so estimates can be checked against logged work.
Try with my Linear
$10k of $15k
Hourly
0:00:00
Alejandro Luna0:00:00Kai Nani0:00:00Kai Nani0:00:00Click!
Dave Jung0:00:00Alejandro Luna0:00:00Dave JungThe calculator gives you the number — Everhour takes it from there.
One click and you're timing. Start a timer, add an entry, edit the details. This is exactly how it feels in Everhour.
Set a budget, assign rates, and get alerted before you're over.
Measurement
Track your budget through time or costs
Every report you need — configured your way, always up to date.
Tracked hours flow straight into a polished invoice — no copy-paste, no manual math.
You came here to compare the estimate on a Linear issue with the time people recorded against that same issue. The practical output is a clear variance: the work landed near the estimate, exceeded it, or finished under it. That comparison helps a lead decide whether the issue was under-scoped, split poorly, interrupted by unplanned work, or recorded incompletely.
Keep the comparison at the issue level first. Linear issues carry context such as project, assignee, status, labels, priority, cycle, and estimate, so the review should keep those fields attached to the logged hours. A single issue view answers the immediate question. A project or date-range view shows whether the pattern repeats across related work.
Estimates on Linear issues are effort or size values, not clock time. Linear supports estimate scales such as Exponential, Fibonacci, Linear, and T-Shirt, so one team may use 1-2-3-5-8 while another uses XS-S-M-L-XL. Treat those values as planning units unless your team has a documented hour-estimate practice outside the point scale.
The common mistake is forcing a point-to-hour conversion after the work is done. That makes the variance look precise without proving the original estimate meant hours. A cleaner review keeps the issue estimate visible, records actual hours separately, and adds a short reason for major gaps, such as missing discovery, blocked review, scope change, or late manual time entry.
A high actual total does not always mean the estimate was wrong. The issue may have expanded, waited on review, absorbed production support, or included work that belonged in a separate issue. A low actual total also needs review because it can signal efficient delivery, overestimated work, or missing time entries. The decision comes from the notes around the variance.
Use a consistent review window. For cycle-style planning, compare work completed during the same date range as the cycle window, then read totals by issue, assignee, and project. Cycles are useful as a review rhythm, but the estimate-versus-actual decision still rests on issue estimates, recorded hours, and the delivery context attached to the work.
A one-off comparison is enough when you need to check a single project, prepare a retrospective, or explain why a specific issue exceeded its estimate. The result should show the issue, estimate, actual hours, variance, assignee, status, and note. That gives you a usable answer without turning every small review into a standing process.
A managed workflow matters when those comparisons shape budgets, staffing, or client commitments. Everhour can track time inside Linear through embedded controls, then support approvals, locked periods, admin corrections, personal tracking limits, roles, project assignments, team groups, and team-wide policy defaults. That turns scattered variance checks into a record that future estimates and budgets can use.
This content is for general information only, may not be fully up to date, and is provided without any warranty or liability.
High Performer
G2
Summer 2026
Best Ease Of Use
Capterra
Summer 2026
Rated in the top time trackers across G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius — with consistent praise for ease of use, integrations, and support.
Place the issue estimate beside the hours logged to the same issue, then review the difference with status, assignee, project, and date range. Keep the estimate as the planned effort value and the tracked hours as measured time. Add a note for large gaps so the next estimate uses context, not just a number.
Effort points and hours should stay separate unless your team has defined a written conversion rule before planning starts. Linear estimate scales such as Fibonacci, Exponential, Linear, and T-Shirt describe relative size or effort. Logged hours measure time spent. Mixing them after delivery creates a false precision that weakens the review.
Review scope changes, blockers, rework, late manual entries, missing time, assignee changes, and work that should have been split into another issue. A variance without a reason only says the plan and record differed. A short explanation turns the gap into a planning input for the next issue or project.
Review issue-level variance at the end of each planning window or project milestone. A weekly or cycle-aligned date range works when the team ships continuously. Project milestones work better for longer initiatives. The review should be frequent enough to catch repeated under-scoping before it affects budget, staffing, or delivery commitments.
The biggest mistake is treating missing time as proof that the estimate was accurate. An issue can appear under estimate because people forgot to log review, debugging, meetings, or follow-up work. Check time-entry completeness before changing estimate rules or using the result to judge delivery performance.
Everhour Team Management supports approvals, locked periods, admin time correction, personal tracking limits, roles, project assignments, team groups, and team-wide policy defaults. Those controls help managers review recorded time before variance reports influence budgets, staffing decisions, or the next set of estimates on Linear issues.
Everhour embeds tracking controls in Linear through its browser extension and syncs Linear workspace, project, issue, status, and tag data into reports. Team members can use timers or manual entries on issues, then managers can review reported time alongside estimates, project totals, and issue context.
Track approved hours against Linear issues, review variance by project and team, and use Everhour Team Management controls to turn actual work records into better future estimates.
14-day free trial · No credit card · Cancel anytime
